Blame it on the Yanks

It’s been debated in plenty of places whether new stadiums actually are a boon for the surrounding communities or not. Do they help the people and small businesses that feed off the team and the stadium or do they really just enrich the already rich? The Village Voice seems to come down more than a little hard on the Yankees, seemingly blaming them for the serious poverty and hunger problems that exist in the district that also houses the 2009 World Series Champs:

Here’s new evidence of what the new Yankee Stadium has brought to The Bronx. Not only is the borough home to one of the poorest congressional districts in America — the home of the new, heavily-subsidized stadium and the current World Champs can also boast that their ‘hood is also the hungriest Congressional district in the nation!

As of the last census, in 2000, the 16th Congressional District was the poorest in the nation, with 42.2 percent of residents living below the poverty line. Now, nearly a decade later, a new Gallup poll finds that more than 36 percent of people in the 16th have reported that there are times when they have not had money to buy food for themselves or their family.

This compares to a hunger rate of “just” 16.5 percent in the greater New York/New Jersey/Long Island area.

C’mon…if anyone could realistically think, imagine, envision a new stadium turning around one of the poorest areas in the nation within a year of its opening, you’re fooling yourself. Yankee Stadium has been at essentially the same location for 80 odd years. That area of the Bronx didn’t suddenly become impoverished and if the “old” stadium wasn’t helpful, why would we think that the “new” one would change it overnight?

Select View Full Post to continue reading

Neil deMause, who also writes for The Village Voice and Baseball Prospectus (his blog is entitled “Field of Schemes“, which is also the title of his book about the economics of new stadium construction), had this to say:

To be fair, the new Yankees stadium has only been open a year, and hadn’t even opened when these numbers were compiled, so you can’t actually blame Bronx hunger on the team, though it is reasonable to ask what the city could have done to alleviate poverty with its $691 million share of the stadium costs.

And going back to the original Village Voice article, they even noted:

The Gallup poll from which this finding comes was begun at the beginning of last year, so economic relief from all the good jobs and economic activity spurred by opening the new Yankees stadium may not have been included.

Well, at least we got that straight. Or did we?

But wait! The Daily News also offers this telling metric of how well the boondoggle is floating The Bronx’s boat: City Harvest says that while only 381,364 Bronx residents visited “emergency food programs” in the third quarter of 2008, in the third quarter of this year — at the height of the first season in the new park — that number had increased by 17 percent, to 445,900 people.

No, a significant recession in this country isn’t to blame; blame the Yankees. NYC’s been particularly hard hit, but feel free to hoist the blame on the Yanks.

New York City’s unemployment rate for the month of December hit 10.6 percent, higher than it has been in 17 years.

And if you’re into checking out the stats, click here to see the table that shows The Bronx’s unemployment rate at an even higher 13.9% in December 2009.

But blame the Yankees.

 

5 Responses to “Blame it on the Yanks”

  1. I can’t think straight right now, but I think I agree!

  2. leonora says:

    I can understand pointing it outsince when new stadiums are in proposal phase proponents love to say it’ll create X number of jobs in the neighborhood/etc.
    On the other hand, who really believes that?

  3. JasonIIATMS says:

    Leonora, funny ain’t it? It’s almost like believing the candidates for political office will follow-through on their campaign promises.

    yeah, right!

  4. Alex K says:

    The stadium may have actually helped the businesses surrounding it, but do the owners of those establishments live in the neighborhood?  That is another of the flaws in the “the new stadium will help the local community” arguments (no matter how small a part it may play).

  5. misterd says:

    Dare I ask what the educational backgrounds and marketable skills of the people in this community? What about the family structure? Or am I just being silly for not picketing Jeter’s house?