Neil deMause, who also writes for The Village Voice and Baseball Prospectus (his blog is entitled “Field of Schemes“, which is also the title of his book about the economics of new stadium construction), had this to say:
To be fair, the new Yankees stadium has only been open a year, and hadn’t even opened when these numbers were compiled, so you can’t actually blame Bronx hunger on the team, though it is reasonable to ask what the city could have done to alleviate poverty with its $691 million share of the stadium costs.
And going back to the original Village Voice article, they even noted:
The Gallup poll from which this finding comes was begun at the beginning of last year, so economic relief from all the good jobs and economic activity spurred by opening the new Yankees stadium may not have been included.
Well, at least we got that straight. Or did we?
But wait! The Daily News also offers this telling metric of how well the boondoggle is floating The Bronx’s boat: City Harvest says that while only 381,364 Bronx residents visited “emergency food programs” in the third quarter of 2008, in the third quarter of this year — at the height of the first season in the new park — that number had increased by 17 percent, to 445,900 people.
No, a significant recession in this country isn’t to blame; blame the Yankees. NYC’s been particularly hard hit, but feel free to hoist the blame on the Yanks.
New York City’s unemployment rate for the month of December hit 10.6 percent, higher than it has been in 17 years.
And if you’re into checking out the stats, click here to see the table that shows The Bronx’s unemployment rate at an even higher 13.9% in December 2009.
But blame the Yankees.

Here’s new evidence of what the new Yankee Stadium has brought to The Bronx. Not only is the borough home to one of the poorest congressional districts in America — the home of the new, heavily-subsidized stadium and the current World Champs can also boast that their ‘hood is also the hungriest Congressional district in the nation!
I can't think straight right now, but I think I agree!
The stadium may have actually helped the businesses surrounding it, but do the owners of those establishments live in the neighborhood? That is another of the flaws in the "the new stadium will help the local community" arguments (no matter how small a part it may play).
I can understand pointing it outsince when new stadiums are in proposal phase proponents love to say it'll create X number of jobs in the neighborhood/etc.
On the other hand, who really believes that?
Leonora, funny ain't it? It's almost like believing the candidates for political office will follow-through on their campaign promises.
yeah, right!
Dare I ask what the educational backgrounds and marketable skills of the people in this community? What about the family structure? Or am I just being silly for not picketing Jeter's house?