Getting over Ian

For my part, I’m not really interested in taking sides on the question, because it really doesn’t seem worth arguing over. Having Ian Kennedy would certainly be very nice these days, but on the other hand, I very much enjoy having Curtis Granderson on the team. Considering that Granderson has without question been the Yankees’ best player this year, I don’t see much of a point in giving the trade much thought at all in retrospect. Even if you were very bullish on Kennedy at the time, at this point the worst case scenario for the trade is that it was a value for value swap that brought the Yankees a power hitting centerfielder with a team friendly contract in the prime of his career. Considering that, is it really any surprise that at least one of the pieces Brian Cashman had to give away is having success now? That’s just the way these swaps work, you have to give something to get something. Trading Wilson Bettimit for Nick Swisher is the exception, not the rule.

Now the knew wrinkle is that the Yankees “picked wrong” in trading Kennedy instead of Joba Chamberlain or Phil Hughes. That’s an interesting proposition, as it allows for a way in which the Yankees could have Kennedy and Granderson, but I think it really relies on a heavy dose of forgetting the lay of the land after the 2009 season. Remember that Kennedy was sort of the odd man out in the bunch, the guy who hadn’t really had any major league success to that point and seemed to be falling behind the other two members of the Big Three. Hughes had been a revelation for the team in the bullpen, and would of course go on to have an excellent 2010, before tiring as the season wore on, something not at all uncommon for young pitchers. Joba is a different matter, I suppose, but I still contend the only “problem” with Joba is that the front office foolishly decided to give up on him after his more or less league average performance in 2009.

To be fair, I think even in retrospect I probably would have preferred to trade Joba rather Kennedy, at least knowing the Yankees wouldn’t be giving him a chance to start. But who’s to say Arizona would want him? Joba had more service time than Kennedy and was set to go to arbitration after 2010, making him more expensive than Kennedy and giving him less time of team control left. He also suffered an arm injury in 2008 that had seemed to sap some of his electric stuff in 2009. So I think it’s a pretty dubious assumption that Arizona would have even been willing to accept Joba in Kennedy’s place at that point, and a huge reach to imagine anyone thinking it would have been better to trade Hughes than Kennedy in the winter of 2009-10.

Anyway, I guess my point is to just stop worrying about this. The trade worked out for everyone involved, the Yankees have been able to piece together a pretty good rotation anyway, and Curtis Granderson may well win the American League MVP award. Pining for Ian Kennedy will only drive you crazy for no good reason.

About Brien Jackson

Born in Southwestern Ohio and currently residing on the Chesapeake Bay, Brien is a former editor-in-chief of IIATMS who now spends most of his time sitting on his deck watching his tomatoes ripen and consuming far more MLB Network programming than is safe for one's health or sanity.

10 thoughts on “Getting over Ian

  1. Agree with Devon. Good post. Kennedy is collateral damage and the past is the past. Good for him for succeeding with the Diamondbacks. There is no guarantee he would be the same pitcher in the AL East.

  2. A couple of years later the performance of current upper level pitching prospects will factor into the reviews of this trade. If Banuelos, Betances and company fails to help round out the rotation, people will keep revisiting the trade. If they do well and become #3 starters or better, then people should forget the trade soon, assuming that the guys in the trade improves/ages in a reasonable way.

    • If the B's develop ill take back my post (below) about questioning the yankees ability to develop pitchers. I just am skeptical that they will develop

  3. The quewtion i ask fom the trade isnt who got the better end or should we have kept Kennedy and traded someone else. But, is there a flaw in the Yankee development of young arms. I wonder if JJoba would be better somewhere else, not just for the cliche "change of scenery" but becauwe of better development say in Atlanta, Oakland or San Francisco. Three organizations who have a lot of home grown talent at pitcher. Obviously those organizations were fortunate with the picks they got to select the players to develop, but you still don't have that kind of success on a continuous basis without good development.

    • I still don't see where anything went wrong with Joba's development other than the front office stupidly giving up on him after 2009.

      • Agreed. The only thing wrong with Joba (though no fault of his own) is that he was too dominating in his first season and everybody (possibly including the front office) just uses that season as the standard for him.

      • I didn't see anything wrong in Ian Kennedy's development process either. But when he left something changed with him. So basically what im questioning is do we have very good pitfhing coaches at the developmental level or a veey ggood developmental process. I guess i didnt quite make that point overly clear.

  4. Joba has worn out his welcome in Cashman & Girardi's minds. Trading Joba over the winter would be good for Joba.