Deconstructing Freddy

That leaves us with Freddy. Oh, the things that can be said about Freddy. In retrospect, I actually think his 2011 season has been a bit overrated (an FIP- of 99 over 146 innings isn’t bad, by any means, but it’s not world beating by any means), but solid is solid, and Garcia certainly outperformed everyone’s expectations for him. If nothing else, you can legitimately say that it began to feel like the Yankees had a good chance to win every time he took the mound for a start, and that’s not nothing for a pitcher like Garcia.

So can he repeat his 2011 performance next season? I’m skeptical. 2011 was a clear outlier in Garcia’s career trend line, and though the bottom line performance was good, the underlying peripherals weren’t really there. Consider this illustration of Garcia’s career arc (only years in which Garcia pitched at least 100 innings are included, and since 2004 was the last time Garcia struck out at least six batter per nine innings, the table starts in 2005):

As you can see, 2011 sticks out like a sore thumb, and the numbers that really reach out and grab you are the home run rates,
which went down noticeably, and the groundball rates, which went down even more noticeably. In other words; Garcia had his best season in terms of allowing home runs since 2004 while giving up quite a few more fly balls in line drives. That’s almost certainly not sustainable, nor is Garcia’s ability to strand baserunners which, at 77% in 2011, was a career best for Freddy.

None of this is to trash Freddy, per se. He had a very nice season last year, and there’s no reason not to keep him around if that’s what everyone wants. But it should be noted that good fortune likely played a not unsubstantial role in his 2011 success, and Garcia would be best viewed as a good back of the rotation option for the sake of depth, not one of the two or three best starters in the organization. If the Yankees are planning to go into 2012 with the current rotation, they’re playing with fire.

About Brien Jackson

Born in Southwestern Ohio and currently residing on the Chesapeake Bay, Brien is a former editor-in-chief of IIATMS who now spends most of his time sitting on his deck watching his tomatoes ripen and consuming far more MLB Network programming than is safe for one's health or sanity.

2 thoughts on “Deconstructing Freddy

  1. I have no problem w sweaty Freddy as the Number 5… But not as the number 3. Another reason this is a good signing is if the Yanks do make some moves, and add an arm or two, Freddy becomes pretty attractive trade bait in February when a lot of teams are searching for a #5.. in some cases a #4.

  2. News flash! The Yankees rotation is iffy! Well gee, thanks for sharing! To me, the big question mark isn't Garcia. He's at best a servicable back of the rotation starter, nothing more. Burnett? Well, we know what we'll get from him. He'll be good until the All-Star break, then fall apart like he does very year. Hughes, however, is the real dilemma. Is he the pitcher that won 18 games in '10, or the '11 edition that spent more time on the DL than on the mound? Until the Yankees know the answer to that question, anything else is just speculation.