Jason Bay? Why?

 

5 Responses to “Jason Bay? Why?”

  1. jay_robertson says:

    Wow – 49 million? Really? And I thought the brothers and Randy were the masters of horrid contracts. For this to work, there'd have to be a trade, AND the Mets would have to be on the hook for the extra $17 mil.

    Still wouldn't be very tempting at that point, but really – neither is AJ.

  2. Mike says:

    Wow. Burnett for Alfonso Soriano makes 100x times more sense than that. Actually, signing me off the street might make more sense than that.

  3. BeanTooth says:

    It's impossible to quantify, but I wonder how much being The Guy in Flushing hurt Bay. I lived in Pittsburgh when he was there and he made no secret of the fact he liked playing in a place with little pressure. Even in Boston he was a secondary player. By signing the huge contract with the Mets, he heaped more scrutiny on himself then he probably imagined. Would becoming a part-time DH for the Yankees change that? Or is he just a bad player now? I have to admit to being intrigued by the idea (only if there's an agreement to drop the 2014 option), but that might just be irrationality.

    • BrienJackson says:

      I think he's just a bad player now. There were warning signs that he was beginning to decline as early as the 2009 season in Boston.

  4. Dave says:

    I think another reason why the deal is tempting is because Swisher isn't clutch in the playoffs and had a slow start last year. With Bay, you can swap the two to be your DH or right-fielder game-by-game and pick one to stay next season. All in all though, I'd rather sign Damon.