In case you missed it, some inside information from the Houston Astros organization was leaked online and Deadspin had the story.
Two years ago, the Houston Astros constructed "Ground Control"—a built-from-scratch online database for the private use of the Astros front office. It is by all accounts a marvel, an easy-to-use interface giving executives instant access to player statistics, video, and communications with other front offices around baseball. All it needs, apparently, is a little better password protection.
Documents purportedly taken from Ground Control and showing 10 months' worth of the Astros' internal trade chatter have been posted online at Anonbin, a site where users can anonymously share hacked or leaked information. Found below, they contain the Astros front office's communications regarding trade overtures to and from other teams, as well as negotiations—a few of which actually led to trades. You will find heavy efforts to get a big haul for Bud Norris at last year's trade deadline (before settling for very little), pushes to acquire touted young talents like Dylan Bundy and Gregory Polanco, and even evidence the Astros rejected out of hand a blockbuster deal that could have brought them Giancarlo Stanton.
The most interesting tidbit from this story, at least from our perspective, is that the Yankees were willing to "eat" $4.5 million of Ichiro Suzuki's $6.5 million salary.
Oh, and there was this nugget from 11/24/13:
"[Yankees AGM Billy Eppler] reached out to [Stearns] to see if we had interest in Chris Stewart."
It's a pretty fascinating read and I'm sure the person responsible for the hack/leak will get into some trouble.
UPDATED 6:20 P.M.: The Astros released a statement:
“Last month, we were made aware that proprietary information held on Astros’ servers and in Astros’ applications had been illegally obtained. Upon learning of the security breach, we immediately notified MLB security who, in turn, notified the FBI. Since that time, we have been working closely with MLB security and the FBI to the determine the party, or parties, responsible. This information was illegally obtained and published, and we intend to prosecute those involved to the fullest extent.
“It is unfortunate and extremely disappointing that an outside source has illegally obtained confidential information. While it does appear that some of the content released was based on trade conversations, a portion of the material was embellished or completely fabricated.”
I'm guessing it was the Chris Stewart stuff that was completely fabricated, right?