As I said when news broke that the Yankees were close to getting a new deal done with Freddy Garcia, the one potential concern I had was that the Yankees now have five nominal starting pitchers on what figures to be the 25 man roster coming out of Spring Training, and that makes me a little bit worried about what their plans for the rotation are as of today. And now, along those lines, Andrew Marchand is openly wondering if the Yankees are not, in fact, going to be deep in the market for more pitching, with the flat out assertion that he simply doesn’t think there’s any way the Yankees sign C.J. Wilson, the best pitcher on the market.

For the most part, I don’t think that silence to this point in the Hot Stove season really means much. General managers can deny it all they want, but I think you’d have to be pretty naive to actually believe teams weren’t waiting to see what the new CBA would bring (especially with both sides pushing some major changes) before making too many commitments this winter. Now, with the CBA done, Thanksgiving past, and the Winter Meetings right around the corner, I expect things to start moving pretty quickly, at which point the market for available players will really start to take shape.

So to that end, I can’t say I’d be totally surprised if the Yankees don’t make anymore moves. They’re certainly not likely to drastically overpay for one of the available starters, especially with some big raises for Robinson Cano, Curtis Granderson, Brett Gardner, and David Robertson potentially on the horizon. But they do have some money to spend, and are once again in a situation where their projected starting rotation is C.C. Sabathia followed by four question marks. Given that context, I really can’t envision them standing pat unless the market goes well beyond what they’re willing to invest.

One theme I’ve heard the commissioner’s office trot out in defense of the new cap on amateur playing spending is that the semi-slotting system will create a draft in which players are selected “in order of talent,” rather than having some of the top prospects in the draft dropping out of the top half of the first round due to signability issues. There’s some conceptual logic here, to be sure. Under a true hard-slotting system, talented high school players would have little incentive to spurn the drafting team for college, as the potential future returns on waiting would be much lower. And to be honest, the current system will probably do a reasonably good job of approximating that effect. Beyond that narrow exception, however, the logic here seems deeply flawed to me.

First of all, I don’t see much of a case that this phenomenon of talented players routinely dropping to deep pocketed teams because of outrageous signing demands is actually happening anymore. The last two most notable cases are Zach Lee and Josh Bell, who were viewed as tough signs for different reasons. Bell had what was thought to be a firm commitment to play college ball at Texas, and told teams prior to the draft that he intended to go to college no matter what, causing him to fall into the second round. Lee had a commitment to play quarterback at LSU, and teams let him fall to the Dodgers and the 28th overall pick in 2010. But a funny thing happened along the way; both of these players signed with the team that drafted them, for amounts of money that wouldn’t have been particularly outrageous if they’d been picked at the top of the first round.

(click “view full post” to continue reading)

Happy Thanksgiving from Brian Cashman.